The place where someone works. One's own machine that processes, stores, and retrieves a large amount of data. An area allocated for someone to work in, especially in an office.
![]() Another Word For Terminal Download Microsoft WordMicrosoft Word for Macbook Air. Download Microsoft Word for Macbook Pro. Download Microsoft Word for Mac. Film programs that film at 30 fps for macLike Superconsole, Cmder and other out there.Mean by that - that we're not trying to crack into NORADComputers with our machines or anything else like that.Experience has shown that it's hard for a smaller group ofPeopleto act against the forces of linguistic change in theLarger world. There is other 'alternative' but in reality it is the same ConEmu with some guy modifications made public, a good-looking theme and a bunch of scripts to please everyone needs. DisplayBarcode field codes are not supported for the Convert to PDF action.ConEmu is the best Windows terminal. Template creation in Word for Mac is not supported. Developer tab is not available on Word online. Click the link if you'reInterested. Perhaps we should promote the use of a differentTerm instead." I've always been one for educating peopleOn the proper terms, but with the media still largelyNot-getting-it, would we be better off finding anotherGroup moniker? There's more. For this reason, I feel thatOur best efforts may not be enough to shake off theDefinition of 'hacker' that the public has largely lockedOn to. So I askSlashdot: What might be a better (or at least less confusing)Often when I'm hanging around fellow computer-knowledgable friends I might say something about how I should hack such-and-such together over the weekend for a personal project or school. For example, the term 'villain'Originally meant 'belonging to the villa', and referred toThe best thing I could come up with was the term'white-knight hacker', which isn't very good. When a formerly positive or benignWord starts taking on a negative connotation, linguistsCall it pejoration. I know that I personally have called computer criminals hackers. It could refer to coding (even bad coding! "I just hacked this crap together last night at 3 am"), or building hardware, or pulling of an awesome prank, or - I daresay - breaking into a computer system. I call myself a coder.Hacking has gathered different meanings over time. It's a stupid term that means many different things. ![]() How do you decide if somebody is worthy of being considered a "hacker"? It's much easier (but wrong) to classify one based on whether they break into systems or not, an erroneous oversimplification of which both the media and slashdotters (and things such as ESR's jargon file) are guilty.It has to be admitted that Jon Katz is right in this case.We should be more worried about the plight of those who aren't crackers, or those who are but are smart enough to say they are hackers, who, like Kevin Mitnick are rotting in jail without even having a fair bail hearing and others who are being raided by the FBI and demonized in the press for fairly innocent manipulations of data that caused no harm and were only rooted in the deep seated desire for knowledge that is within every true hacker who ever walked the face of the earth. You cannot say "all hackers are crackers," (what the media and people like IBM's security guru say), but you also can't say "no crackers can be considered hackers," as many slashdotters say.That's a problem because it's subjective. However, some crackers are not hackers, and some hackers are not crackers. Some hackers are crackers, and some crackers are hackers. System intruders (or "crackers," if you prefer), and "hackers," are neither synonymous or mutally inclusive (as the media erroneously assumes), or mutally exclusive (as many slashdotters erroneously assume).That's the problem. These are commonly programmers and power users. This is because, following the invention of the Personal Computer by Woz, the archetype split into several major categories.The first, and currently the most persecuted archetype, is the True Hacker, commonly referenced by the titles of magi (Acolytes to Wizards/Gurus). It's now a blanket that sadly covers all computer-savvy individuals. Would starting to use a new term necessarily make the old one void? Or would we be using both depending on company?BTW-When I said about seeing it often in Linux, I wasn't trying to say I think it's unstable, because I know it isn't, too.This is more from someone that has a lot of time on his hands, but I think this might help some people grasp the enormity of the situation facting all hackers and the public in general today.First, I will say that Hacker is no longer a simple term to describe one type of person. I like it.As I say, I still like the term hacker. TK427 - Do you copy?Well, personally I still like the term hacker, but yeah it does cause a lot of confusion.If a new term is really what we're after, something someone mentioned in a comment (which I now can't find) inspired a little idea in me.The consensus of opinion from a few people seemed to be that using an old term might be a good idea, so how about something we see reasonably often in using Linux (even if it doesn't need to run), something that has already made its way into slang, something that can sum up the idea of poking about with something to get it working.If that's awkward to say, either because of formal company or whatever, or just because of linguisticyness, you could perhaps pronounce itOr something. The GNU tools, Linux, and Perl are the most obvious examples.The original split was two-way: The True Hackers previously mentioned, and the Dark Hackers. In this respect, the most valued members of this community are seen with awe, simply because their givts are among the most ubiquitous. This could be interpreted as a new and more successful form of Socialism, without the inherant flaws of the government-controlled form used in the olde Soviet Union. Warez Doodz had one remarkable hack of their own they developed the distribution networks throughout the countries that delivered the freshly-cracked software to millions of people worldwide, and was able to exist, regardless of the legal actions to prevent them. Dark Hackers actually found the task challenging, almost like a strategy game against the companies they develop protection, the hackers found ways to circumvent them.Following the Dark Hackers came three new types, which exist to this day: Warez Doodz, Script Kiddies, and Criminal Hackers.Warez Doodz were often the siblings/friends/associates of these Dark Hackers. The practice was personal the dark hackers did not practice simply to redistribute the software the Warez Doods, which came after, did this. Due to the concept of a "Software Licence" at the time, these hackers followed a path that was deemed illegal by software companies. Because of the cramped conditions of those computers at the time, these programmers mastered the use of machine code and assembly language. These are the computer-savvy individuals who knowingly commit crimes using computers. Kevin Mitnick is considered among the higher ranks of this hierarchy since I don't frequent this society, I can't really tell for sure.Criminal Hackers are just scary. This structure is a hierarchy, where the requirements for reaching a new level is to break higher security. They do not know how to program, and commonly don't know what to do with the information when they get it, but they continue to practice their activites, while commonly answering to a society of their own, whose most revered members commonly refer to themselves as the "3733+" (eleet). They use software developed by the Dark Hackers to break into other computers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorVictoria ArchivesCategories |